The theme of the National Science Month celebration in the year 2025, "Harnessing the Unknown: Powering the Future through Science and Innovation", serves in some manner like a deliberate call to forage exploration with purpose; to regard uncertainty not as a barrier but as a frontier that is to be molded through human ingenuity. Science is not merely the act of unearthing nature's secrets; it is the medium through which societies can unleash their innovations against the persistent challenges posed by real-world issues, from those concerning climate resilience to public health. This boost is meant to inspire communities not only into scientific literacy but also to develop a culture that appreciates curiosity and problem-solving that meets real social needs.
This marks the initiation of the work for a collaborative approach to knowledge creation process, albeit in a linear form involving researchers producing knowledge that is then applied by society. Open science and public engagement advocate for discursive processes in knowledge transfer to be open to greater democracy. Science or dialogues could also be looked at from the angle of value creation models where research creates not only data but also social value through public policy, education, and social practice. Meanwhile, public trust in science is of prime importance, so the finding that the majority of people from 68 countries advocate more engagement of scientists in decision-making suggests the expectation that science ought to be socially pertinent and participatory.
But such a deepening interdependence has responsibility and tension associated with it. The more science is incorporated into societal decision-making, the more unavoidable ethical reflection, transparency, and inclusiveness become. The risks of misinformation, distrust, and unequal access to the supposed benefits of technology must be directly confronted. In that specific interpretation, envisioning science as a public good serves to frame one's responsibilities-both collective and individual-for scientists and institutions. In time, the most resilient societies will be those that become gradually open about scientific inquiry, moderated reflexively, and guided collectively with and by the communities that it serves.
Lakomý, M., Hlavová, R., & Machackova, H. (2019). Open science and the science–society relationship. Society, 56, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-019-00361-w
Ramos-Vielba, I., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., & Woolley, R. (2022). Scientific research and societal impact: Value creation and knowledge exchange. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 191. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01211-6
Cologna, V., Evans, M., Fiske, S. T., et al. (2025). Global public opinion supports scientist participation in policymaking. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5
Yin, Y., Zhou, Y., & Hu, J. (2021). Science as a global public good: The roles of open science and responsible innovation. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.00152
Comments
Post a Comment